Is the Hungarian title "vitéz" the same as the English "Sir", or just similar?
- v. Balázs Róbert
- Jun 17
- 3 min read
Comparing the Titles “Vitéz” and “Sir” in Historical and Social Context
We have often heard this question – particularly in the United Kingdom – primarily from our English friends and acquaintances, but it may also have arisen in discussions among ourselves.
If we were to give a brief answer, it would be: yes and no – but let us explore the subject in more depth.
Clarifying the Question
A comparison of the titles “Vitéz” and “Sir” in historical and social context.There are certain cultural and functional parallels between the Hungarian title “vitéz” and the English honorific “Sir”. However, their origins, legal status, and social roles are rooted in different historical traditions.
The Title “Vitéz” in Hungary
The title “vitéz” gained official status in the 20th century, in the aftermath of the First World War, when Regent Miklós Horthy established the Vitézi Rend (Order of Vitéz) in 1920. The purpose of the order was to recognise military service and acts of heroism in defence of the homeland.
The induction ceremony for new members resembled that of medieval chivalric orders: the Captain-General (or his appointed deputy) would touch the kneeling recipient’s shoulder with a ceremonial sword – a symbolic gesture also seen in British knighthood ceremonies.
Members of the Order were granted the right to use the “vitéz” prefix before their surname, which conferred significant moral recognition and social prestige – though it did not constitute an official noble title.

Previously, members of the Order were – in certain cases – awarded land grants (“vitézi telek”), further reinforcing their social status. The title was awarded based on individual merit and, although a son could petition to inherit it, it was not automatically passed down through generations.
The Title “Sir” in the United Kingdom
In the Anglo-Saxon tradition, the title “Sir” is an official form of knighthood, conferred by the monarch – currently the King – in recognition of personal merit.
The title places the recipient within the broader framework of social hierarchy and is associated with noble rank, although it does not automatically grant hereditary peerage.

It is typically awarded for exceptional contributions in military service, science, the arts, or public life. The “Sir” prefix is placed before the recipient’s first name (e.g., Sir Brian May).
The female equivalent is “Dame”, which confers similar recognition and status.
Comparison Table
Aspect | Vitéz (Hungary) | Sir (United Kingdom) |
Historical origin | 1920, Order of Vitéz | Medieval chivalric system |
Nature of the title | Honorific, based on military merit | Royal knighthood |
Legal status | Moral recognition, not a noble title | Legally recognised noble rank |
Inheritance | Limited, by petition | Not hereditary |
Female equivalent | None officially | Dame |
Form of address | “vitéz” + surname | “Sir” + first name |
Modern use | Part of civilian and military tradition-keeping | Official state honour |
Conclusion
The titles “vitéz” and “Sir” both serve as formal recognition by the nation or state, honouring the recipient’s service and merit. While “Sir” remains an official part of the British system of nobility, the “vitéz” title upholds the Hungarian tradition of military honour – symbolically noble, but not conferring actual nobility.
Thus, while functional parallels can be drawn between the two, they differ significantly in legal status and historical foundation.
Comments